Where we stand on the anti-idling ordinance

August 3, 2010
By

Annelise O’Connell of Mini Spotters recently penned an op-ed piece to the SCMP objecting to my editorial, “Idling while air pollution goes through the roof”. In her SCMP piece, Annelise stated emphatically that, “the Legislative Council needs to pass this [anti-idling] bill without exemptions.”

Annelise’s point of view is certainly understandable (and, indeed, commendable). Indeed, her editorial presents a timely opportunity to clarify CAN’s position on the anti-idling bill.

Of course, CAN supports the idling bill. In fact, CAN is one of the EPD’s first allies when it comes to rallying public support and media attention in favor of the bill. Only last week, for example, we accompanied Edward Yau on his tour around Hong Kong to experience taxi and bus drivers’ queuing without the benefit of air conditioning. Moreover, we issued a joint press release with Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth on that day highlighting the dangers to pedestrians and outdoor workers of roadside emissions. And, as you know, we requested prominent organizations and schools to make deputations in LegCo to support of the bill.

The main point of my editorial piece was to decry the hysteria and massive waste of political capital surrounding the efforts to both win and defeat the bill. The fact is, even if the bill passed without exemptions today, the old, very polluting state of our commercial diesel fleet would make any improvements in roadside emissions de minimis. We have far too many old, filthy vehicles on the road. Idling or not, they are a huge problem. Every minute that a pre-Euro vehicle is running on the road, it is polluting the air 34 more times than a Euro V vehicle.

So, while we do support the idling bill, let’s not lose the forest for the trees. Given the current very polluting state of our commercial diesel fleet, ANY end-of-tailpipe solution will be insufficient to significantly mitigate our roadside pollution problem.

That is not to say, of course, that the anti-idling bill is unimportant. Rather, the anti-idling bill simply needs to be considered for what it is: first and foremost, it is a crucial step to changing attitudes in society at large towards air pollution. (It goes without saying that, in our crusade for clean air, our primary interest is protecting pedestrians and outdoor workers from roadside emissions always.)

That said, I do want to say how grateful CAN is to organizations and individuals, especially schools and medical associations, who have spoken out in support of the anti-idling ordinance. Their vocal and conspicuous support has been indispensable to raising the profile of the issue among the general public and heartening others to express their support of clean air publicly.

Joanne Ooi

CEO, Clean Air Network

Related Posts

  1. Leading Schools & NGOs to appear before LegCo to support anti-idling ordinance
  2. CAN joined hands with Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth to show support for the anti-idling bill on Monday
  3. Meeting recap: LegCo prepares to vote on anti-idling bill
  4. CALLING FOR LEGCO DEPUTATIONS: Why the anti-idling bill needs your support
  5. Students express support for anti-idling bill at LegCo
TwitterFacebook

Comments are closed.

 

 

Donate to CAN

You CAN find it

Library

Share this Article

Become a Fan

健康空氣行動 | Clean Air Network (CAN) on Facebook

Archives