Response to CAN’s position on bus route rationalization – by Danny
The letter below was received in response to our recent blog post describing our position on bus route rationalization, http://www.hongkongcan.org/eng/2010/01/5126/.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Agree with you the best solution is change environmental friendly bus. But I also support the exchanging spot but no change of the fare of the bus especially at tunnel areas. Fair charge or subvention to the public vehicle to use the the private operated tunnels is also good to reduce conjection and quere of vehciles that casuse uncessary pollution is one of the way to reduse pollution too.
Danny Tse
—————
We are genuinely interested in hearing your feedback! Many of our best ideas come from members of the public. Just as importantly, criticism and recommendations from the public on how we can improve our coverage or commentary can only improve our content. [N.B. The content of these communications is reprinted without correction of grammar, spelling or punctuation.] Send your comments and feedback to info@hongkongcan.org.
Related Posts
- Response to CAN’s position on bus route rationalization – by Mary
- Response to CAN’s position on bus route rationalization – by Ken
- Response to CAN’s position on bus route rationalization – by Fred
- Let’s not lose the forest for the trees: CAN’s view on bus route rationalization
- Replacing old buses, rather than route rationalization, is the key to cleaning up roadside emissions
